Back
HIGH COURT OF KERALA
R. NARAYANA PISHARADI, J
VENUGOPAL V – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the case. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. court's analysis and interpretation of legal provisions. (Para 8 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29) |
| 3. arguments regarding procedural violations. (Para 9 , 10 , 30 , 32) |
| 4. key legal conclusions regarding investigation requirements. (Para 35 , 41 , 47) |
| 5. final order and dismissal of petition. (Para 49 , 50) |
ORDER
The petitioners are accused 1 to 4 in the case registered as V.C.No.04/2021/TSR by the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Vigilance and Anti-Corruption Bureau (VACB), Thrissur for the offences punishable under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (for short 'the Act') and under Sections 465 , 471 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code .
2. The first accused was the Chairman and the second accused was the Vice Chairman of the Guruvayur Urban Co-operative Bank Limited (hereinafter referred to as 'the Bank') during the year 2017. Accused 3 and 4 were members of the Director Board of the Bank during that period.
3. The Bank had invited applications from eligible candidates to fill up six posts of appraisers and five posts of peons. The co
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
