Back
HIGH COURT OF KERALA
S.MANIKUMAR, CJ, MR. SHAJI P.CHALY, J
JAGANNATHA PRASAD @ REGHU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts regarding the consumer dispute. (Para 2) |
| 2. court’s reasoning on procedural integrity in judgments. (Para 3 , 8) |
| 3. appellant's arguments on jurisdiction under consumer protection act. (Para 4) |
| 4. analysis of section 25 and jurisdiction of consumer forums. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 5. interpretation of procedural requirements under rule 15a. (Para 7) |
| 6. final judgment and dismissal of the appeal. (Para 9) |
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 13th day of December 2021
SHAJI. P. CHALY, J.
The captioned appeal is preferred by the petitioner in W.P. (C)No.20153/2021 challenging the judgment of the learned Single Judge dated 30th September 2021 by which, the following relief sought for in the writ petition was declined:
“Issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order, or direction calling for the records relating to Exhibits P10 and P15 issued by the District Consumer Redressal Commission, Kottayam and to quash the same.”
2. Brief material facts for the disposal of the appeal are as follows:
Appellant was one of the opposite parties in C.C.No.1055 of 1998 on the files of the District Consumer Dispute Redressal Forum, Kottayam. The complaint was in respect of an agreement executed b
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
