Back
MR. DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN, J
DEVIPRIYA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's young age and innocence highlighted. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. incident involving police officer and accusations. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. petitioner's legal action seeking redress. (Para 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. court's concern noted for the child's mental health. (Para 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 5. further evidence and witness statements presented. (Para 17 , 18) |
| 6. parental distress and repercussions discussed. (Para 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 7. police conduct examined and implications. (Para 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 8. affidavits and assertions from police officials. (Para 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 9. court's viewing of incident visuals confirmed impact. (Para 28 , 29 , 30) |
| 10. determination of violation of fundamental rights. (Para 31 , 32 , 33) |
| 11. judicial expectations from the state government. (Para 34 , 35 , 36) |
| 12. details of police reports and investigations evaluated. (Para 37 , 38 , 39) |
| 13. analysis of witness statements and credibility. (Para 40 , 41 , 42 , 43) |
| 14. psychological trauma and its long-lasting effects. (Para 44 , 45 , 46) |
| 15. court's findings on impact of the incident. (Para 47 , 48 , 49) |
| 16. child's perspective and absence of malice noted. (Para 50 , 51 , 52 , 53) |
| 17. fundamental rights |
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
