IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Kausar Edappagath, J
P. Gopalakrishnan Alias Dileep – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent
ORDER
Dated this the 8th day of March, 2022
This Crl.M.C. has been preferred by the accused No.8 in SC No.118/2018 on the file of the Additional Special Sessions Court (SPE/CBI)–III, Ernakulam (for short, 'the court below') challenging the investigation undertaken and being carried out by the investigating agency under Section 173 (8) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short, Cr.P.C.) pursuant to Annexure 10 report dated 29/12/2021.
2. The petitioner along with the remaining accused faces trial for the offence punishable under Sections 120 (B), 109, 342, 366, 354, 354(B), 357, 376(D), 506(1), 201, 212 r/w 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 66 (E) and 67(A) of the Information Technology Act, 2008 (for short, 'the IT Act').
3. The prosecution case in short is that, on the night of 17/2/2017, the victim, a South Indian cine actress, was abducted and sexually assaulted by the accused Nos.1 to 6 in a moving vehicle at Ernakulam while returning from the shooting location pursuant to a conspiracy allegedly schemed by the petitioner, a South Indian Cine actor and producer.
4. The crime was registered on the date of occurrence itself. The investigation was conducted by a special tea
Ram Lal Narang v. State (Delhi Admn)
Sri.Bhagwan Samardha Sreepada Vallabha Venkata Vishwanandha Maharaj v. State of A.P & Others
Hemant Dhasmana v. CBI and Another
Rama Chaudhary v. State of Bihar
Amrutbhai Shambhubhai Patel v. Sumanbhai Kantibhai Patel and Others
Vinubhai Haribhai Malaviya v. State of Gujarat and Another
Hasanbhai Valibhai Qureshi v. State of Gujarat
M/s.Neeharika Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd v. State of Maharashtra
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.