Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ANIL K. NARENDRAN, P. G. Ajithkumar, JJ
SUO MOTU – Appellant
Versus
TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the case regarding sabarimala temple management. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. introduction and context of the virtual-q system. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. arguments about the appropriateness of managing the virtual-q system. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. statutory provisions guiding the management of devaswoms. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 5. authority of the travancore devaswom board established. (Para 20 , 21) |
| 6. rights regarding access to public worship under law. (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 7. the relationship between law and traditional practices in temples. (Para 28 , 29 , 30 , 31) |
| 8. challenges of crowd management in sabarimala. (Para 32 , 33 , 34) |
| 9. conclusion regarding the management of the virtual-q system at sabarimala. (Para 36 , 37 , 38 , 39) |
| 10. legal framework and protection of personal data. (Para 40 , 41 , 42 , 43) |
“C.R”
ORDER/JUDGMENT
Anil K. Narendran, J.
The common issue involved in D.B.P.No.13 of 2021 and also W.P.(C)Nos.21609 and 21812 of 2021 relates to Virtual-Q system at Sabarimala Temple.
2. D.B.P.No.13 of 2021 has been registered suo motu based on the direction issued on 01.07.2021 by the Division Bench dealing with Devaswom matters. The Divisio
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
