Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
A.M.BABU, J
Petitioner – Appellant
Versus
1st respondent firm TULSI VKL Developers – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. disputes arose from the partnership agreement and its terms. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. respondents argue that petitioner’s retirement nullifies claims. (Para 3) |
| 3. petitioner asserts arbitration request is valid despite retirement. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. arbitration clauses survive partnership dissolution; disputes are arbitrable. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 5. existence of arbitration agreement and disputes confirmed. (Para 9) |
O R D E R
Dated this the 04th day of March, 2025 This Arbitration Request is filed invoking Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) seeking to appoint an Arbitrator with respect to disputes and differences that have arisen between the petitioner and respondents under Annexure I and Annexure III.
2. Petitioner and the 2nd respondent were partners of the 1st respondent firm TULSI VKL Developers which was constituted vide Annexure I partnership deed dated 23.11.2015. The said partnership deed contained an arbitration clause at Clause 16. The business of the 1st respondent firm was that of property developers and builders. Annexure II understanding termed as 'partners of understanding' was entered into between the petitioner
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
