SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(SC) 226

RANJAN GOGOI, R.BANUMATHI
KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD – Appellant
Versus
KURIEN E. KALATHIL – Respondent


JUDGMENT

R. BANUMATHI, J.

These appeals have been filed against the impugned judgment dated 28.01.2009 in W.P.(C) No.31108 of 2007 and order dated 23.06.2009 in R.P.No.542 of 2009, passed by the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulum in and by which the High Court directed the appellant-Kerala State Electricity Board (KSEB) to pay an amount of Rs.12,92,29,378/-with simple interest at the rate of 9% per annum in the dispute arising out of a contract between the appellant-Board and the respondent-Contractor.

2. The dispute between the appellant-Board and the respondent-contractor had a chequered history. Brief facts which led to filing of these appeals are as follows:-Appellant-Kerala State Electricity Board (KSEB) entered into an agreement on 16.09.1981 with respondent-contractor for construction of a composite dam across Karamanthodu at Padinjarethara in connection with Banasura Sagar Scheme (Kuttiyadi Augmentation Scheme). After commencement of work, Government of Kerala issued a notification dated 30.03.1983, by which minimum wages payable to certain categories of workers employed





























































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top