Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
T. R. Ravi, J
SELBIN BOBAN – Appellant
Versus
NATIONAL MEDICAL COMMISSION – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks permanent registration under medical acts. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. rejection of registration based on off-campus study contested. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court examines eligibility criteria and prior rulings. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. court clarifies requirements for foreign medical graduates. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 5. court rules in favor of petitioner, allowing registration. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 6. final ruling on permanent registration granted. (Para 21) |
JUDGMENT
The prayers in the writ petition are; to quash Ext.P11, to declare that the petitioner is entitled to get permanent registration under Section 25 (4) of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 ('the 1956 Act' for short) and for a direction to the 2nd respondent to grant permanent registration under (4) of the 1956 Act or the provisions of Act 30 of 2019 to the petitioner.
2. The petitioner acquired the Doctor of Medicine degree, equivalent to MBBS, from American International Medical University, Saint Lucia and passed the screening test prescribed under the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 and Screening test Regulation, 2002 and claims to be entitled to get permanent registration under
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
