Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ANIL K. NARENDRAN, J
MUHAMMED RASHEEKH – Appellant
Versus
THE JOINT REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER KOTTARAKKARA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks registration for a motor caravan. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. application rejected due to non-compliance. (Para 5 , 8 , 11 , 13) |
| 3. court emphasizes adherence to regulations. (Para 6 , 17 , 18 , 25 , 29 , 30) |
| 4. requirement for compliance with laws upheld. (Para 35 , 36 , 70) |
| 5. petitioner to resubmit compliant application. (Para 77 , 78) |
JUDGMENT
The petitioner, who purchased an Eicher Skyline Pro 3009 H Cowl and Chassis AB BS4 (Medium Passenger Motor Vehicle) manufactured by M/s.Eicher Motors vide Ext.P1 sale certificate dated 20.04.2018 from M/s.AVG Vehicle Sales & Services Pvt. Ltd, Kottayam, has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of certiorari to quash Ext.P5 order dated 08.10.2018 issued by the 1st respondent Joint Regional Transport Officer, who is the Registering Authority, and Ext.P7 order dated 03.12.2018 issued by the 3rd respondent Deputy Transport Commissioner, who is the Appellate Authority, refusing to register the motor caravan built on the cowl and chassis covered by Ext.P1 sale certificate, alleging violation of provisions of Rule 125G of the Central Motor Vehicles Rules , 1989.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
