IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ADV.THOUFEEK AHAMED – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 17th day of September, 2020
Manikumar, CJ
Petitioner claims to be a practicing advocate and a social worker. As part of his social activities, he was elected as one of the Secretaries of the Muslim Association, Trivandrum, a socio cultural and educational society. It is submitted that this writ petition is filed for indulgence of this Court to resolve the practical difficulties faced by Muslim men in the matter of getting divorce. Talaq e bidaat or triple talaq was declared as unconstitutional by a Full Bench of the Hon'ble Supreme Court inShayara Bano and Others v. Union of India & others [ (2017) 9 SCC 1 ].
2. After the judgment ofShayara Bano's case (cited supra), Union of India, represented by Secretary (Justice), Ministry of Law & Justice, New Delhi, 1st respondent, has brought into force the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act , 2019, and Section 2 (C) declared talaq-e-bidaat illegal and void, and imposed penal provisions. It is also submitted that by the amendment of the , 2019, No.20 of 2019, a lot of confusion has crept in, so far the divorce by men are concerned. The life of a couple may lead to divorce due to several reasons and aft
Shayara Bano and Others v. Union of India & others
Mallikarjuna Rao and Ors. v. State of Andhra Pradesh and Ors.
Suresh Seth v. Commissioner, Indore Municipal Corporation and Ors.
Municipal Committee, Patiala v. Model Town Residents Asson. and Ors.
Indian Soaps and Toiletries Makers Association v. Ozair Husain and Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.