Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Nitin Jamdar, CJ
P.A. NIZAR – Appellant
Versus
FOOD SAFETY STANDARDS AUTHORITY OF INDIA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners' obligations as registered food business operators necessitate adherence to food safety standards. (Para 2 , 9 , 10 , 21) |
| 2. notice of non-compliance provides opportunity to contest findings before court action. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. regulatory authority must ensure compliance with defined drinking water standards. (Para 5 , 6 , 12) |
| 4. presence of toxins in drinking water renders it unsafe per applicable regulations. (Para 17 , 20) |
Nitin Jamdar, C. J.
These two appeals arise from the common order passed by the learned Single Judge dated 22 February 2023, by which the writ petitions filed by the Appellants/Petitioners were dismissed.
2. In W.P.(C) No.24915 of 2022, from which W.A. No.704 of 2023 arises, the Petitioners/Appellants had challenged the communications dated 30 April 2020 and 17 March 2021 issued by Respondent No.4 – the Assistant Commissioner of Food Safety (Designated Officer), Ernakulam. In W.P.(C) No.15880 of 2021, from which W.A. No.707 of 2023 arises, the Petitioners/Appellants had challenged the letter dated 14 January 2021 issued by Respondent No.3 – the Assistant Commissioner of Food Safety (Designated Officer), Ernakulam.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
