Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Ziyad Rahman A. A, J
JUSTIN PAUL – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner challenges rejection of building regularization. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. petitioner's arguments against objections raised by panchayat. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. court's analysis of objections and directive for reconsideration. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
J U D G M E N T
The petitioner, who constructed a building based on a building permit secured from the 3rd respondent Panchayath on 02.03.2018, has approached this Court, being aggrieved by Ext.P4 order passed by the 4th respondent, rejecting the application for regularisation of the building and also against Ext.P8 demand notices requiring the petitioner to pay building tax at three times of the normal rate, as the building is allotted with unauthorised number. The facts that led to the filing of this writ petition are as follows:-
2. As mentioned above, based on the building permit obtained by the petitioner, he completed the construction of the building and submitted an application for occupancy certificate. As per Ext.P1, the 4th respondent highlighted certain defects which are seven in number, in the construction carried out by the petitioner. As against Ext.P1, Ext.P2 was submitted, specifically explai
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
