Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
R.NARAYANA PISHARADI, J
S K PANDIT – Appellant
Versus
CHANDRAPRAKASH D DEO – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of case concerning alleged forgery and temple management. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments regarding lack of evidence for cheating and forgery. (Para 5 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. legal definitions and implications of cheating and forgery. (Para 9 , 10 , 13) |
| 4. decision to quash proceedings due to insufficient evidence. (Para 24 , 26 , 27) |
O R D E R
The petitioner is the second accused in the case C.C.No.467/2012 on the file of the Court of the Judicial First Class Magistrate, Kochi. He seeks to quash the proceedings against him in the case by invoking the power of this Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Code').
2. The case against the petitioner is one instituted upon the complaint (Annexure-II) filed by the first respondent (hereinafter referred to as 'the complainant'). The history of the Sree Krishna Swamy Devaswom/Temple (hereinafter referred to as 'the temple') and the administration and management of the properties of the temple is narrated in the complaint. However, the material averments/allegations in the complaint, with regard to commission of the offences alleged against the accused, are the following: Th
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
