Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Murali Purushothaman, J
Gopinathan Pillai.M., Gopalakrishnan.N., Swayamprakash.S, Regu Kumar.S – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court will not deny higher pension due to bulk payment misallocation. (Para 1 , 7) |
| 2. petitioners challenged contributions limits imposed on pension. (Para 2 , 3 , 5) |
| 3. petitioners exercised options for higher pension based on actual wages. (Para 4 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. court clarified entitlement to higher pension must reflect actual contributions. (Para 6 , 8 , 9 , 12) |
JUDGMENT
Since the parties are the same and common issues arise for consideration in these writ petitions, they are disposed of by this common judgment. For the sake of convenience, unless otherwise expressly indicated, the exhibits and the status of the parties referred to in this judgment will be as obtaining in W.P.(C) No.40261 of 2024.
2. The petitioners retired from the service of the 4th respondent, a Central Society registered under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969, on various dates after 01.09.2014. W.P.(C) No.40261 of 2024 is filed for the following reliefs:
“i] Call for the records leading to issue Ext. P15 and similar orders issued to other petitioners and quash the same by issuing a writ of certioriari or any other appropriate writ order or direction.
ii] declare that all the petitioners
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
