SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 49525

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
, J
LINSON – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners:
For the Respondents:

ORDER

The order passed by the Fast Track Special Court, Pathanamthitta, in C.M.P No.207/2025 in SC No.423/2021, disallowing the prayer for discharge of the accused in the said case, is under challenge in this revision. The offence alleged against the petitioner/accused is under Section 376 IPC .

2. The prosecution case is that by giving false promise of marriage, the petitioner indulged in sexual relationship with the de facto complainant on several days in the month of August 2017, and also on a day in the month of October 2017. It is stated that in the above sexual relationship, the de facto complainant got impregnated. Alleging that the petitioner has backtracked from his offer for marriage, the de facto complainant preferred a complaint before the Pulikeezhu Police in Pathanamthitta District, leading to the registration of this crime. After the completion of investigation, the Inspector of Police, Thiruvalla, laid the Final Report alleging the aforesaid offence.

3. Upon commitment and make over of the case, the learned Special Judge of Fast Track Special Court, Pathanamthitta, initiated proceedings against the petitioner. At that time, the petitioner filed the aforesaid petition

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top