SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Online)(KER) 6412

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
P.V.ASHA, J
V G ANUPAMA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Both these writ petitions are filed by the very same petitioner. In W.P.(C) No. 9440 of 2012, petitioner challenges the condition imposed in Ext.P6 order while granting her Leave Without Allowance (LWA) for study purposes, that she had to rejoin duty as a new entrant on expiry of the leave. In W.P.(C) No.13556 of 2014, petitioner challenges the action of the High Court in rejecting her representation without forwarding it to Government, in which she had requested for converting her application for leave as one under Rule 91. The documents referred to are as described in W.P.(C) No.9440 of 2012 unless specified otherwise.

2. The petitioner was appointed as a Munsiff-Magistrate in Kerala Judcial Service as per Ext.P2 order dated 25.7.2008. After undergoing training for a period of one year from 18.8.2008, she took charge as Munsiff on 21.05.2009. On 30.8.2010, she submitted application for LWA for one year from 13.09.2010, for study purposes in order to undergo Ph.D at National Law School of University. By Ext.P4 order dated 4.11.2010 Government accorded sanction for the same from date of avail after that order subject to conditions laid down in Appendix XIIB, Part I KSR. Ther

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top