Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN, M.B. SNEHALATHA, JJ
VIVEK R – Appellant
Versus
LAKSHMI S – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner challenges family court order on custody rights. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. respondent's concerns about overnight custody addressed. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. previous incidents influence current custody discussions. (Para 6) |
| 4. custody ought to prioritize the children's welfare. (Para 7) |
JUDGMENT Devan Ramachandran, J.
The petitioner challenges Ext.P10 order of the learned Family Court, Ernakulam, but only within a very small compass.
2. Sri.T.Naveen – learned counsel for the petitioner, explained that his client has been constrained to approach this Court only because, even though he had also asked for weekend interim custody of his children, it has been denied to him. He prayed that this Court be pleased to grant him the same, modifying the impugned order.
3. Smt.Pramaja D. Nair – learned counsel for the respondent, submitted that her client has no objection in the petitioner – father being given interim custody of their children on a couple of weekends every month; but prayed that he be directed to be in Ernakulam and not to take the children to Chennai or anywhere else. She explained that her client is apprehensive that if the petitioner takes the children away, he may n
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
