SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 52039

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
GOPINATH P., J
JAYAN JOSE – Appellant
Versus
THE SALES OFFICER / SENIOR INSPECTOR CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 12642 OF 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.MITHUN P., SHRI.SUMEEN S.
For the Respondents: SHRI.B.V.JOY SANKAR, SMT.CS SHEEJA (GP)

The court allows repayment of debts in installments to balance creditor rights and debtor opportunities post-confirmation of property sale.

Headnote:The judgment pertains to a writ petition filed by the petitioner seeking repayment of dues to the respondent bank in installments, following the confirmation of property sale due to default under the Kerala State Co-operative Agricultural and Rural Development Bank Act, 1984. The court found that granting an opportunity to repay the outstanding amount in installments was justified. The main issue centered on the legal allowance for repayment of debts post-sale confirmation. The court's ratio decidendi emphasized the necessity of balancing creditor rights with debtor opportunities; thus, the petitioner was directed to settle the dues in 18 months, with specified conditions for property reconveyance. The final outcome was allowing the petitioner to repay the due amount without coercive action against his property.

Table of Content
1. petitioner seeks to repay dues. (Para 1 , 2)
2. discussion on the bank's willingness to reconvey. (Para 3)
3. court's directive on installment repayment. (Para 4)
4. final judgment disposal of the writ petition. (Para 5)

JUDGMENT

Petitioner availed credit facilities from the the 2nd respondent bank. On default being committed, proceedings were initiated against the petitioner under the provisions of the Kerala State Co-operative Agricultural and Rural Development Bank Act , 1984 leading to issuance to Exhibits P1 to P3 notices. This prompted the petitioner to approach this Court by filing the above writ petition.

2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is only seeking the liberty of repaying the entire amount in some instalments.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent bank submits that the sale of the property of petitioner was conducted and the sale has also been confirmed by the Joint Registrar on 27.03.2025. However, it is submitted that, since the sale was confirmed in favour of the bank, if the petitioner clears the entire liability within a short time, the bank is willing to reconvey the property to the petitioner. It is submitted that, the outstanding amount, as on 27.03.2025, is Rs.15,51,807/- (Rupees Fifteen lakhs fifty one thousand eight hundred and seven only).

4. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions made as recorded above, I am of the view that the petitioner can be granted an opportunity to repay the outstanding amount in eighteen instalments.

5. Accordingly, there will be a direction to the respondent bank to accept repayment of the entire outstanding amount of Rs.15,51,807/- (Rupees Fifteen lakhs fifty one thousand eight hundred and seven only) along with accrued interest, costs and bank charges from the petitioner in the following manner:

(i) The outstanding amount of Rs.15,51,807/- (Rupees Fifteen lakhs fifty one thousand eight hundred and seven only) shall be repaid in eighteen equated monthly instalments along with any accrued interest, costs and charges;

(ii) The first instalment shall be paid on or before 20.12.2025 and the subsequent instalments shall be paid on or before the 20th day of the succeeding months;

(iii) If the petitioner clears the entire liability as aforesaid, the sale shall be cancelled and the property shall be reconveyed to the petitioner. Any expenses meet by the petitioner in connection with such reconveyance, shall also be borne by the petitioner;

(iv) In the event of default of any one instalment, the respondent bank shall be entitled to proceed in accordance with the law;

(v) In order to enable the petitioner to repay the entire amounts as above, all coercive proceedings shall be kept in abeyance.

The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top