JUDGMENT

This writ petition is filed seeking the following reliefs:

“i. a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ order or direction to call for the records leading to Ext.P6 order and quash the same.

ii. a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or direction to first respondent to allow the Ext.P5 application submitted by the petitioner under Form 5 of the Act, 2008. OR a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or direction to the first respondent to reconsider Ext.P5 application submitted by the petitioner under Form 5 of the Act, 2008 on the basis of the Ext.P2 & P3 building permits and afford an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner within a reasonable time.

iii. such other relief’s as this Hon’ble Court deems fit to grant in the nature of this case.

iv. a direction to dispense with filing of the translation of vernacular document produced with this writ petition” [SIC]

2. The petitioner is aggrieved by Ext.P6 order passed by the 1^st respondent rejecting Ext.P5 Form–5 application submitted by the petitioner under the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Rules, 2008 (‘Rules’, for brevity). The main grievance of the petitioner is that the