Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN
Vinumon C. S/o Chenthamarakshan – Appellant
Versus
District Collector, Palakkad – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. critical view on the standardization of form-5 orders. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. flaws in the handling of form-5 applications by authorized officers. (Para 6 , 7 , 10) |
| 3. framework of the kerala conservation of paddy land and wetland act. (Para 8) |
| 4. legal standards for evaluating land status under act 2008. (Para 11 , 12 , 24) |
| 5. directions to re-evaluate form-5 applications with detailed speaking orders. (Para 20 , 25) |
JUDGMENT :
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
