IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
GARLAND EXPORTERS AND IMPORTERS – Appellant
Versus
SUB COLLECTOR AND REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, THRISSUR – Respondent
JUDGMENT
The above Writ Petition (C) is filed with the following prayers:
"i) Call for the records pertains to Exhibit P6 order of
2nd respondent and quash the same by issue a writ of certiorari or any other order or writ or direction.
ii) Issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ, order or direction, directing the 2nd respondent to allow Exhibit P2 application filed in Form 5 under the provisions of Act 28 of 2008 by the petitioner for removing the entry from the data bank;
iii) Declare that an extent of 23.74 Ares of property in Sy No. 288/6, Block No. 057 of Peringandoor Village, Thalapally Taluk, Thrissur District. is dry land.
iv) Issue such other appropriate writ, order or direction which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit in the circumstances of the case.
v) Dispense with production of filing of translation of vernacular documents.”
[SIC]
2. The petitioners are aggrieved by the order passed by the 2nd respondent rejecting the Form–5 application submitted by them under the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Rules, 2008 (‘Rules’, for brevity). The main grievance of the petitioners is that the authorised officer has not considered the contentions of the petitioners.
3.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.