T.K. PETER vs THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER MUVATTUPUZHA

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 52309

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
T.K. PETER – Appellant
Versus
THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER MUVATTUPUZHA – Respondent

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.PAUL K.VARGHESE, SMT.A.A.GEETHA
For the Respondents: SR.GP, SMT. VIDYA KURIAKOSE

Table of Content
1. nature of the petition and relief sought. (Para 1)
2. counsel satisfaction with directives. (Para 2)
3. court's directive for timely report submission. (Para 4)

JUDGMENT

The above writ petition is filed with following prayers :

“ i. Issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writs, order, or direction commanding the respondent herein to consider and dispose of Ext. P5 Form No. 5 application within a time specified by this Hon’ble Court, relying on Ext. P3 and P4 by allowing it.

ii. To dispense the production of the English translation of Malayalam Exhibits, which are in the vernacular language. iii. Issue such other order or direction as may be necessary in the facts and circumstances of the case. “ [sic]

2. When this writ petition came up for consideration, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he will be satisfied if a direction is issued to consider Ext.P5 application submitted in Form 5 under Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Rules , 2008.

3. Heard the learned Government Pleader also.

4. After hearing both sides, I think that prayer can be allowed.

Therefore, this writ petition is disposed of with the following directions:

1) The 4^th res

Click Here to Read the rest of this document