Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ANIL K. NARENDRAN, MURALEE KRISHNA, JJ
ANISH M.J. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction of parties and case background. (Para 1) |
| 2. judgment reproduced, outlining procedural requirements. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. court hearing and issue identification for appeal. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. submission on appeal already filed by respondents. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 5. contestation regarding appeal's maintainability. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 6. discussion on prior rulings affecting current appeal. (Para 10) |
| 7. legal standards on alternative remedies for writs. (Para 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 8. error in maintaining status quo and jurisdiction issues. (Para 14) |
| 9. conclusion and order on appeal disposition. (Para 15) |
JUDGMENT
Anil K. Narendran, J.
The appellant is the 8th respondent in W.P.(C)No.39367 of 2025, which was on filed by the respondents 8 and 9 herein- petitioners, invoking the writ jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of certiorari to quash Ext.P13 order dated 30.08.2025 of the 3rd respondent Joint Registrar of the Co-operative Societies (General), Kottayam; a declaration that the 8th respondent-auction purchaser (appellant herein) is not entitled for confirmation of the sale conducted pursuant to Ext.P3 sale proclamation dated 29.12.2023 as
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
