Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
A. BADHARUDEEN, J
SAINALABDHEEN @ SINE S/O.SHAMSUDHEEN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. criminal appeals filed under section 374(2) cr.p.c. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. prosecution case on criminal conspiracy. (Para 3 , 5) |
| 3. evidence and testimonies presented during trial. (Para 4 , 6 , 8 , 19) |
| 4. points raised by defense regarding evidence and demands. (Para 7 , 10 , 11) |
| 5. importance of demand and acceptance in corruption cases. (Para 12 , 14 , 15) |
| 6. contentions regarding pre-trap verification and evidence. (Para 16 , 18 , 20) |
| 7. recovery of money and verification of testimonies. (Para 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 8. results from forensic evidence and recovery tests. (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 9. legal standards for proving corruption offences. (Para 28 , 29) |
| 10. burden of proof on prosecution regarding demand. (Para 30 , 31 , 32) |
| 11. arguments on the necessity of pre-trap verification. (Para 33 , 34) |
| 12. final decision on conviction and sentencing. (Para 35 , 36 , 37) |
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 24th day of November, 2025
These criminal appeals have been filed under Section 374 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as ‘ Cr.P.C .’ for short) by accused Nos.1 and 2 respectively in C.C.No.239/2008 on the files of the Special Court, Kottayam, challenging the conv
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
