SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Ker) 2828

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
A.BADHARUDEEN
Sunil Kumar K, S/o. Madhava – Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : ADV SRI.NANDAGOPAL S.KURUP

JUDGMENT :

A. BADHARUDEEN, J.

Being aggrieved by the conviction and sentence imposed against the appellant/accused, who is the sole accused in C.C. No. 153 of 2016 on the files of the Enquiry Commissioner and Special Judge, Thalassery, the present appeal has been filed by the appellant/accused. The State of Kerala, represented by the Vigilance and Anti-Corruption Bureau (VACB), is the respondent.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant/accused as well the learned Special Public Prosecutor in detail. Perused the records of the special court and the decisions placed by the learned counsel for the appellant/accused and the learned special Public Prosecutor .

3. The prosecution case is that the accused, while working as Forester on special duty at the Forest Range Office, Kasaragod, abused his official position and demanded illegal gratification from PW2 for the release of a mini lorry bearing registration No. KL-14C-99, when the said vehicle had been ordered to be released by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kasaragod, on 23.01.2012. The further allegation is that the accused negotiated with PW2 and reduced his initial demand for ₹10,000 to ₹5,000. Thereafter at about 2:30 p.m., on 0

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top