Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, P. V. BALAKRISHNAN, JJ
JOSEPH C.S. – Appellant
Versus
MANAGING DIRECTOR, KERALA STATE WAREHOUSING CORPORATION – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts regarding the writ petition and selection process. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. appellant's arguments against the single judge's order. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. court's analysis of requested reliefs and statutory compliance. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. established principle on judicial relief limitations. (Para 10) |
JUDGMENT
[WA Nos.622/2018, 1033/2018, 1058/2018, 1682/2018]
Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari, J.
Regard being had to the similitude of the matters, these Writ Appeals have been heard analogously and are decided by a common judgment.
2. The intra-Court Appeals under section 5 of the Kerala High Court Act , 1958 assail the judgment dated 18.01.2018 passed in W.P.(C) No.30759 of 2015 and other connected writ petitions.
3. The brief facts of the case are that the appellants are the respondents in the Writ Petition. The Writ Petition was filed challenging the appointment of the appellants to the post of Class IV Grade II staff in the Kerala State Warehousing Corporation (for short ‘Corporation’) after conducting writ- ten test and interview. The Writ Petition was filed with a prayer to recall the appointment of the appellants herein and further to revise the rank list by publishing the m
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
