Devan Ramachandran , J.

The appellant challenges the judgment of the learned Family Court, Malappuram, in OP No.336/2024.

2. The appellant has edificed this appeal on various grounds and allegations; but we must record upfront that we are incapacitated from considering any of those on merits, for the singular reason that even an ex facie glance through the judgment would render it luculent that the learned Family Court does not seem to have considered any of the germane aspects – at least it being not discernible from it; nor has a reason been given for allowing the Original Petition filed by the respondent.

3. The Original Petition was filed by the respondent herein seeking “declaration of dissolution of marriage” (sic); and he filed his proof affidavit, along with certain documents in substantiation. It is stated that the appellant herein contested the matter, opposing the case of the respondent. However, as we have said above, the learned Court has allowed the Original Petition, merely saying that “the chief affidavit and documents proved the case of the petitioner” (sic).

4. To reiterate, we find no reasons in the impugned judgment for the learned Family Court to have entered into