Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN, M.B. SNEHALATHA, JJ
SUBAIDA – Appellant
Versus
ABDUL AZEEZ – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the appellant contests the family court's decision regarding the dissolution of marriage. (Para 1) |
| 2. the family court failed to consider crucial evidence and arguments before reaching a conclusion. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. the judgment is set aside, and the matter is remitted for reconsideration. (Para 7) |
Devan Ramachandran , J.
The appellant challenges the judgment of the learned Family Court, Malappuram, in OP No.336/2024.
2. The appellant has edificed this appeal on various grounds and allegations; but we must record upfront that we are incapacitated from considering any of those on merits, for the singular reason that even an ex facie glance through the judgment would render it luculent that the learned Family Court does not seem to have considered any of the germane aspects – at least it being not discernible from it; nor has a reason been given for allowing the Original Petition filed by the respondent.
3. The Original Petition was filed by the respondent herein seeking “declaration of dissolution of marriage” (sic); and he filed his proof affidavit, along with certain documents in substantiation. It is stated that the appellant herein contested the matter, o
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
