SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Ker) 1036

DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN, M. B. SNEHALATHA
K. H. Abdul Shukoor – Appellant
Versus
M. M. Zarin – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: M.Shajna K.M.Firoz
For the Respondent: Siraj Karoly, Mohammed Shad K.A.

Judgement Key Points

What is the process for conducting a summary inquiry into the validity of talaq/khula in Family Courts? What are the rights of a party to file a counter claim or counter statement in a summary inqury into khula validity? What is the binding effect of Asbi K.N. (supra) on procedures for assessing validity of khula and related pronouncements?

What is the process for conducting a summary inquiry into the validity of talaq/khula in Family Courts?

What are the rights of a party to file a counter claim or counter statement in a summary inqury into khula validity?

What is the binding effect of Asbi K.N. (supra) on procedures for assessing validity of khula and related pronouncements?


JUDGMENT :

Devan Ramachandran, J.

What we propose to say in this judgment is virtually a sequel to the declarations of law by another learned Division Bench of this Court in Asbi.K.N. v. Hashim M.U. [2022 (6) KHC 159]. This is because, even though, in Asbi K.N. (supra), this Court has held that the enquiry to be conducted by a Family Court - as to if the pronouncement of talaq/khula/ talaq-e-tafweez was made validly - shall be the nature of an uncontested matter, and being summary in nature, it is argued by the petitioner herein that, even in such a course, he is entitled to file a written statement, as also to maintain a counter claim against such motion.

2. We are, however, of the view that the afore contention is untenable, and we will record our reasons presently.

3. The respondent filed O.P.No.1527/2023 before the learned Family Court, Irinjalakkuda, for a declaration that the ‘khula’ she pronounced against the petitioner be declared valid.

4. The petitioner, thereupon, filed an application to allow him to prefer a counter affidavit, as also to maintain a counter claim; and on the assertion that it is unlikely to be considered by the learned Family Court, he approached this Court a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top