IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
SHIHAB – Appellant
Versus
REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER – Respondent
JUDGMENT
The above Writ Petition (C) is filed with the following prayers:
" a). issue a Writ of Certiorari and quash Exhibit.P4 order of rejection issued by the first respondent after calling for the records leading to the issuance of the same.
b). Issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to delete an extent of 1 Are 84 Square meter of property in Resurvey No.396/2-1-3 of Block No. 28 of the second respondent village from the data bank.
c). Issue a writ of mandamus directing the first respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders in Petitioners application submitted in Form no.5 for correction of the mistake in the data bank submitted by the petitioner afresh in view of the relevant provisions and government orders .
d). Declare that an extent of 1 Ares84 square meters of property in Resurvey No. 396/2-1-3 of Block No. 28 of the 3rd respondent village is not a land to be included in the data bank."
[SIC]
2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order passed by the 1st respondent rejecting the Form–5 application submitted by him under the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Rules, 2008 (‘Rules’, for brevity). The main grievance of the petitioner is that the au
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.