IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
SALIM.M.P. – Appellant
Versus
THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER – Respondent
JUDGMENT
This writ petition is filed seeking the following reliefs:
“i. Issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ order or direction calling for the records leading to Ext.P8 and quash the same;
ii. Issue writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or direction directing the respondents to remove the land shown as Nilam (paddy land) in Ext.P1 from Ext.P2 data bank as requested by the petitioner in Ext.P3 forthwith.
iii. issue such other and further orders which this Hon’ble Court may deem just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case; and iv. award costs to the petitioner;
v. Petitioner may be permitted to dispense with the filing of translation of the vernacular documents.”
[SIC]
2. The petitioner herein is the absolute owner in possession of 1.5 Ares in Survey No.61/4 and 7.89 Ares in Survey No.61/5 totaling to 8.94 Ares (22 cents) of Kureekkad Village in Kanayannur Taluk in Ernakulam District. Out of the 8.94 Ares, 4 Ares is already shown as converted land in the data bank. According to the petitioner, the petitioner is coming before this Court for the third time against the denial of his request for correction of entry in the data bank. Ext.P2 is
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.