JUDGMENT

This writ petition is filed seeking the following reliefs:

“i. a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ order or direction to call for the records leading to Ext.P3 order and quash the same.

ii. a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or direction to first respondent to allow the application submitted by the petitioner under Form 5 of the Act, 2008 as evidenced by Ext.P3 order. OR A writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or direction to the first respondent to reconsider application submitted by the petitioner under Form 5 of the Act, 2008 on the basis of the report of KSREC and satellite picture of the property and afford an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner within a reasonable time.

iii. such other relief’s as this Hon’ble Court deems fit to grant in the nature of this case.

iv. a direction to dispense with filing of the translation of vernacular document produced with this writ petition.”[SIC]

2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order passed by the 1^st respondent rejecting the Form–5 application submitted by the petitioner under the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Rules, 2008 (‘Rules’, for brevity). The main griev