IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
RAJAMMA – Appellant
Versus
REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER – Respondent
JUDGMENT
This writ petition is filed seeking the following reliefs:
“a) Issue of writ of mandamus or any appropriate writ, order or direction calling the records leading to the issuance of Exhibit P5 order and quash the same by issuing a writ of certiorari.
b) To declare that the petitioners’ property covered by Exhibit P2 comprised in Re.Sy.No.793/15-3 in Block No.5 of Thrikkakkara North Village is a converted dry land and therefore, direct the 2nd respondent to remove the entry in the data bank as Nilam referring to the petitioners land.
c) To dispense with the filing of the translation of vernacular documents.
d) To issue such other writ order or directions which are deemed fit and proper for the interest of justice ”[SIC]
2. The petitioners are aggrieved by the order passed by the 2nd respondent rejecting the Form–5 application submitted by them under the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Rules, 2008 (‘Rules’, for brevity). The main grievance of the petitioners is that the authorised officer has not considered the contentions of the petitioners.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Pleader.
4. This Court perused the impugned order.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.