MOHAMMED HASHIM K vs STATE OF KERALA - 2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 55218

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 55218

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
MOHAMMED HASHIM K – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.JACOB SEBASTIAN, SMT.SHAMSEERA, C.ASHRAF, SHRI.WINSTON K.V, SMT.ANU JACOB, SMT.ANJANA KRISHNAN
For the Respondents: GP SMT DEEPA V

Table of Content
1. petitioner seeks quashing of order and urgent appeal consideration. (Para 1 , 2)
2. court allows appeal to be considered within three months. (Para 4)

P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J.

----------------------------------------

WP (C)No.45456 of 2025 --------------------------------------

Dated this the 4^th day of December, 2025 JUDGMENT The above writ petition is filed with the following prayers.

“I. Quash Exhibit-P2 order Issuing a writ in the nature of certiorari; ог II. Issue a writ of mandamus, order or direction directing the second respondent to consider and pass orders on Exhibit-P3 appeal after hearing the petitioner within a timeframe keeping Exhibit-P2 in abeyance; III. Dispense with the translated copies of the documents in vernacular language; and IV. Grant such other relief this Hon'ble court deems fit and proper to grant in the facts and circumstances of the case.”(SIC)

2. Aggrieved by Ext.P2 order, the petitioner filed Ext.P3 appeal before the 2^nd respondent. The prayer in this writ petition is for the consideration of Ext.P3 appeal and till then to keep Ext.P2 in abeyance.

3. Heard the Government Pleader also.

4. After hearing both sides, I think, that prayer can be a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document