SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 1449

KERALA HIGH COURT
, J
Meledam Saw Mills v. KSEB


Table of Content
1. multiple appeals on minimum guarantee agreements. (Para 1 , 2)
2. dispute over actual vs deemed consumption under agreement. (Para 3 , 4)
3. legal analysis of supreme court precedents regarding contract applicability. (Para 5 , 6)
4. final decision and direction for examination of case. (Para 7)

1. Both these appeals arise from the judgment of the learned single Judge in O.P. No. 3286 of 1998. The writ petitioner is the appellant in W.A. No. 508 of 1992 whereas the first respondent, Kerala State Electricity Board is the appellant in W.A. No. 599 of 1992.

2. Ext. P3 order issued by the second respondent, the Deputy Chief Engineer, Electrical Circle, Ernakulam was challenged in the Writ Petition. By the said order, the second respondent directed to restore the electrical connection to the writ petitioner on remittance of the amount of Rs. 29,244.73 towards the arrears of electricity charges and reconnection fee. It was passed by the second respondent pursuant to the judgment of this Court in O.P. No. 7447/85 filed by the Writ Petitioner on an earlier occasion. The learned single Judge while disposing of the present writ petition ordered in so far as the disconnection of














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top