SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 1350

KERALA HIGH COURT
Sri. P. Balagangadhara Menon, J
Sunil And Vasanth v. Tata Ceramics Ltd.


Table of Content
1. court observations on the nature and implications of replication. (Para 2 , 3)

1. This revision petition is filed by the defendant in O.S. 407/1996 on the file of the I Additional Sub Court, Ernakulam. The suit was filed by the respondent plaintiff for passing a decree against the defendant for a sum of Rs. 93,06,869/- by way of compensation for alleged loss and damages caused to the plaintiff on account of the sinking of the Petroleum Gas Bullet Foundations as a result of the breach of contract and negligence of the defendant in the matter of design and supervision of the construction of Liquified Petroleum Gas Bullets Foundations. The defendant filed a written statement on 7.12.1996, wherein it was contended that the suit is purely experimental in nature and has been filed without bona fides and with a malicious intention to destroy the professional reputation of the defendant. The defendant denied all material allegations in the plaint and prayed for dismissal of the suit. Thereafter the plaintiff filed a replication on 14.3.1997. The defendant filed I. A. 2922/1997 to reject the replication filed by the plaintiff. That application was allowed and the replicati







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top