Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
, J
Praseetha v. DEO
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's familial claim for appointment based on established court directives. (Para 1 , 1 , 2) |
| 2. counter claims from competitors under educational provisions effecting appointment. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. emphasis on the authority of the education rules over familial claims. (Para 6 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. judicial decisions regarding appointment preference based on legal frameworks. (Para 10) |
| 5. directive for the petitioner to pursue grievances through the revision process. (Para 11) |
1. The petitioner who is a member of a tharwad by name Sooryachira Variam, challenges the action of the first respondent, who is ExOfficio Manager of S.V.S.M.U.P. School, Pudussery, belonging to the said tharwad, in appointing the fourth respondent as U.P.S.A. in the vacancy which arose on account of the retirement of one Mr. P.K. Jayaram senior U.P.S.A. of that school on 31-3-2004, overlooking the claim of the petitioner. The petitioner relies mostly on Ext. P1, which is an order passed by the Munsiff Court, Palakkad, in the final decree application in a suit for partition between the members of the family. According to the petitioner, Ext. P1 has. attained finality and the same binds all the mem
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
