1 Doubting the correctness of the decision of the Division Bench in Shaji v. Kerala State ( 2004 (3) KLT 270 : 2004 (2) ILR Ker. 600) in view of the two earlier judgments of the Apex Court, this Bail Application was referred to the Division Bench. Petitioner is the 2nd accused in Crime No. 18/2004 of Railway Police Station, Shornur. The allegation against the petitioner is that he along with another accused was found to be in possession of 3200 ampules of Norphine (Buprenorphine Hydrochloride) and 60 Ampules Ophenorgon. Petitioner was arrested on 25-6-2005. According to the counsel for the petitioner, he was in custody for about 110 days. Since quantity seized was a 'small quantity' he is entitled to statutory bail as charge sheet is not yet to be framed. Contention of the petitioner is that each ampule contains 0.3 gms. of Buprenorphine and hence what was seized is a small quantity below 1 gm. The Sessions Judge while rejecting the bail application found that since each ampule contains 2 ml. of Morphine, it is considered as commercial quantity coming under S.22(c) and 18(c) read with S.27A of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for. short 'the Act'). His ba