Back
KERALA HIGH COURT
A. M. Shaffique, J
Perumanna Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. Kozhikode and Others v. State of Kerala and Others
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. scope of s.101 and government exemption authority. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. grievances and arguments presented by petitioners. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 3. arguments by the second respondent counsel. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 4. final adjudication and dismissal of writ petitions. (Para 23) |
| 5. historical context and procedural background. (Para 24 , 36 , 42 , 43) |
| 6. evaluation of government's decision-making in public interest. (Para 67 , 68 , 69) |
1. Introduction:
In this batch of writ petitions what falls for consideration is the scope and extent of S.101 of the Kerala Co - operative Societies Act, 1969 ('the Act' for brevity). In other words, in terms of S.101 of the Act, whether the Government as a delegate can have unbridled powers to exempt any society from the operation of the provisions of the Act, especially with specific reference to S.7(1)(c) of the Act?
2. In all the writ petitions the petitioners, different Co - operative Banks, have a common grievance against the same set of respondents. This Court, therefore, proposes to dispose of all the writ petitions through a common judgment. For the purpose of convenience and
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
