R.S.SARKARIA, O.CHHINNAPPA REDDY
Registrar Of Co Operative Societies, Trivandrum – Appellant
Versus
K. Kunjabmu – Respondent
JUDGMENT
CHINNAPPA REDDY, J. :— The perennial, nagging problem of delegated legislation and the so-called Henry VIII clause have again come up for decision in this appeal by the State of Kerala. Section 60 of the Madras Co-operative Societies Act 1932 and a notification issued under that provision were struck down by the High Court of Kerala on the ground of unconstitutional delegation of legislative power. Certain consequential directions were issued by the High Court. These directions have long since worked themselves out and so the party who invoked the jurisdiction of the High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution has no longer any surviving interest. The State of Kerala is, however, interested in sustaining the validity of Section 60 and has filed this appeal.
2. Lawyers and Judges have never ceased to be interested in the question of delegated legislation and since the Delhi Laws Act case, we have been blessed (?) by an abundance of authority, the blessing not necessarily unmixed. We do not wish, in this case, to search for the precise principles decided in the Delhi Laws Act case, nor to consider whether N. K. Papial & Sons v. Excise Commissioner (1975) 3 SCR 607 beats
Edward Mills Co. Ltd. v. State of Ajmer
referred to : The Maharashtra Sugar Mills Ltd. v. The State of Bombay and others
relied on : Harishankar Bagla v. State of M. P.
Sardar Inder Singh v. State of Rajasthan
Pandit Banarsi Das Bhanot v. State of M. P.
Vasantlal Maganbhai Sanjanwala v. State of Bombay
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.