Back
KERALA HIGH COURT
Unknown, Unknown
Meenakshi Subramaniya Iyer v. Central Government Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court Ekm and Others
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. employee's leave history and unauthorized absence. (Para 1) |
| 2. legal notice protocol and employee's reporting. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's analysis of termination procedures. (Para 6) |
| 4. comparison to precedents on unauthorized absence. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 5. petitioner's reliance on amended rules. (Para 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 6. consideration of petitioner's appeal and demands. (Para 17 , 18) |
| 7. dismissal of the writ petition. (Para 19) |
1. The petitioner herein was an employee of the 2nd respondent State Bank of Hyderabad, Ernakulam Branch. She had entered the service of the said respondent Bank on 06/02/1984 as Clerk - Typist at their Ernakulam Branch. While so, she had availed ordinary leave for the period from 25/04/1988 to 24/05/1988 and had proceeded on sick leave on half - pay for the period from 25/05/1988 to 03/08/1988 and had yet again availed extra ordinary leave on loss of pay for the period from 04/08/1988 to 21/02/1989. On 22/02/1989, she had reported for duty and from the next day onwards, viz., 23/02/1989 onwards, she had entered on maternity leave upto 22/05/1989. There is no dispute on either side that the petitioner was sanctioned leave for th
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
