Back
KERALA HIGH COURT
Justices V. Chandrasekharan, J
Perumanna Service Co - operative Bank – Appellant
Versus
Karassery Service Co - operative Bank – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of the writ appeals. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. writ petition challenges regarding operational areas. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. details on operational overlaps and legal challenges. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. arguments on locus standi and public interest. (Para 12 , 18 , 19) |
| 5. arguments regarding administrative procedures. (Para 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 6. court observations on the necessity of public interest. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 7. court's analysis on the decision-making procedure. (Para 30 , 31 , 32) |
| 8. conclusion on the validity of the state's order. (Para 36 , 37 , 38) |
1. These six Writ Appeals have been filed against the common judgment dated 13/10/2015 delivered in a bunch of Writ Petitions. Writ Petition No. 4949 of 2015 was treated as the leading Writ Petition by the learned Single Judge for referring the facts and pleadings. Writ Appeal No. 2441 of 2015 arising out of Writ Petition No. 4949 of 2015 is being treated as the leading Writ Appeal and it shall be sufficient to refer to the facts and pleadings in WA No. 2441 of 2015 for deciding all these Writ Appeals. The parties shall be referred to as described in Writ Petition No. 4949 of 2015.
2. Writ Petition No. 4949 of 2015
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
