SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 31784

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA
D. SESHADRI NAIDU, J
Financier – Appellant
Versus
Legal heirs of the deceased borrower – Respondent


Table of Content
1. dispute over loan repayment and interest rates. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. discussion on legal representation post mortem. (Para 5 , 6)
3. survival of causes of action despite a party's death. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 13)
4. personal actions and their survival in law. (Para 12)
5. final decision to remand the case for adjudication. (Para 14)

1. The petitioner is a financier. In 2007, the first respondent's husband and the 2nd and 3rd respondents' father, now no more, availed himself of two loans by pledging gold ornaments as security. Later, a dispute arose about what should be the rate of interest the financier should charge. Eventually, the matter led to a consumer dispute before the Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Alappuzha.

2. The learned Consumer Forum, through Ext.P1 Order dated 06/07/2010, in C. C. No. 140 of 2010, directed the financier to charge interest at 12% and to release the gold ornaments on the borrower's paying the loan amount along with interest. Aggrieved, the financier filed appeal No. 43/2011 before the Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Trivandrum ("the Commission").

3. As seen from the record, pending the appeal, the borrower

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top