Back
KERALA HIGH COURT
Judgment delivered by, J
M/s Binani Zinc Limited – Appellant
Versus
KSEB – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. economic growth reliant on uninterrupted power supply. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments regarding the legitimacy of power concessions. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. verification and certification process for power concessions. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. assessing evidence and compliance with modernized power conditions. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 5. judicial inquiry into procedural compliance and natural justice. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 6. assessment of legal principles surrounding eligibility for power concessions. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 7. final ruling on entitlement to concessions based on adherence to policies. (Para 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39) |
1. The judgment of the learned Single Judge in O.P.No.9565/1996 stands challenged before us in this appeal by the petitioner, M/s Binani Zinc Limited, a Company established in the year 1966.
2. Availability of cheap power and uninterrupted supply is an essential precondition for rapid industrialization. And industrialization is an essential pre - requisite for economic growth of any State. This is a classic case of how the successive dispensations of governance, in this State; going by
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
