SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 63610

KERALA HIGH COURT
*Anil K. Narendran, P. G. Ajithkumar, JJ.
Greenix Ventures Pvt. Ltd. (M/s.) v. P. M. Salim
R.C.Rev.No.147 of 2022 | R.C.Rev.No.151 of 2022 | R.C.A.No.5 of 2022 | R.C.P.No.17 of 2019



Tenants must deposit admitted rent during eviction proceedings under crisis; failure leads to automatic eviction unless sufficient cause is shown.

Headnote:(A) Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965 - Sections 11(2)(b), 11(3), 12(1), 12(2), 12(3), and 23(1)(i) - Eviction proceedings - Landlords' petition for eviction due to non-payment of rent - Tenants failed to pay admitted arrears amounting to Rs.20,80,000/- since January 2020 - Rent Control Court ordered eviction under S.12(3) for tenants' default, later confirmed by Appellate Authority but granting them three months to comply - Court held that such extension post-confirmation of eviction is not permissible. (Paras 4, 10, 12, 52)

(B) Rent default - A tenant must deposit all admitted arrears of rent to contest eviction proceedings; failure results in automatic eviction unless sufficient cause is shown. (Paras 12, 39)

Facts of the case:
Landlords filed for eviction against tenants due to non-payment of rent from January 2020. The Rent Control Court directed payment of Rs.20,80,000/- as admitted rent, which was not complied with, leading to eviction orders.

Findings of Court:
The Appellate Authority confirmed the eviction order under S.12(3) but incorrectly granted three months for the tenant to pay rent after this confirmation. This was ruled as impermissible by the court.

Issues: Whether the Appellate Authority could grant time for payment after confirming eviction and the conditions under S.12 of the Act regarding tenant obligations were central issues.

Ratio Decidendi: The obligation on tenants to pay or deposit admitted rent is mandatory; any failure results in automatic eviction once the Rent Control Court is satisfied that sufficient cause has not been shown. The appellate review did not allow time extensions in eviction confirmations under S.12(3).

Result: Landlords' revision petition allowed; tenants' revision petition dismissed.

Table of Content
1. introduction and factual background of rent control revisions. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. analysis of tenants' obligations under s.12 of the act. (Para 7 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13)
3. court's evaluation of tenant's failure to deposit rent. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 18 , 19 , 20)
4. judicial precedents on tenant rights and eviction procedures. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24)
5. consequences for defaulting on rent payments. (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29)
6. final decision regarding extension of time for rent payment. (Para 39 , 52 , 54)
7. conclusion and outcomes of the appeal. (Para 41 , 43 , 44 , 48 , 49)

1. These Rent Control Revisions, i.e., R.C.Rev.No.147 of 2022 and R.C.Rev.No.151 of 2022, filed under S.20 of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965 , arise out of the judgment dated 04/07/2022 of the Rent Control Appellate Authority (Additional District Judge - VI), Ernakulam in R.C.A.No.5 of 2022, filed against the order dated 22/11/2021 of the Rent Control Court (Additional Munsiff), Kochi in R.C.P.No.17 of 2019. Since common issues are raised, these Rent Control Revisions are heard together and are being disposed of by this common order.

2. The petitioners in R.C.Rev.No.147 of 2022 are the petitioners - landlords in R.C.P.No.17 of 2019 on the file of the Rent Control Court, Kochi, which was one filed against the petitioners in R.C.Rev.No.151 of 2022, who are the tenants, seeking an order of eviction under S.11(2)(b) and S.11(3) of the Act. The tenants entered appearance and filed an objection in the Rent Control Petition. The landlords filed I.A.No.4 of 2020, an application under S.12 of the Act, seeking an order directing the tenants to deposit admitted arrears of rent. In that interlocutory application, the tenants filed a counter, contending that the monthly rent of the tenanted premises is only Rs.1,60,000/- and not Rs.1,83,000/- as claimed by the landlords. Admittedly, the tenants have not paid any amount towards monthly rent from January, 2020 onwards, even at the rate of Rs.1,60,000/-. After considering the rival contentions, the Rent Control Court passed an order dated 30/01/2021 in I.A.No.4 of 2020, under S.12(1) and (2) of the Act, whereby the tenants were directed to pay admitted arrears of rent amounting to Rs.20,80,000/- for the period from 01/01/2020 till 30/01/2021, at the rate of Rs.1,60,000/- per month, on or before 30/03/2021. The tenants have not chosen to pay or deposit the admitted arrears of rent. No petition was filed for enlargement of time for paying admitted arrears of rent. Therefore, the Rent Control Court passed an order dated 31/03/2021, under S.12(3) of the Act, whereby the tenants were directed to vacate the petition schedule building and put the landlords in possession of that building.

3. The tenants filed I.A.No.6 of 2021 seeking an order to review the order dated 30/01/2021 in I.A.No.4 of 2020. That application was allowed on 27/08/2021 and the tenants were granted two weeks' time to show cause as to why an order under S.12(3) of the Act shall not be passed against them. On 13/10/2021 the matter was adjourned to 16/10/2021 and thereafter to 28/10/2021. On 28/10/2021 the matter was adjourned to 22/11/2021. The tenants did not pay or deposit the admitted arrears of rent. They failed to show sufficient cause for non - payment of admitted arrears of rent. Therefore, the Rent Control Court passed the order dated 22/11/2021 in R.C.P.No.17 of 2019, under S.12(3) of the Act, whereby the tenants were directed to vacate the petition schedule building and put the landlords in possession of that building.

4. The order dated 22/11/2021 of the Rent Control Court in R.C.P.No.17 of 2019 was under challenge in R.C.A.No.5 of 2022 filed by the tenants before the Rent Control Appellate Authority (Additional District Judge - VI), Ernakulam. That appeal ended in dismissal by the judgment dated 04/07/2022. In the said judgment, the Appellate Authority noticed that the tenants have no case that t



























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top