SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 63626

KERALA HIGH COURT
Alexander Thomas, Shoba Annamma Eapen, JJ.
R - 2 & R - 3 – Appellant
Versus
R - 1 & R - 2 – Respondent
W.A. | WP(C) No. 9550/2020



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Sri. P. C. Sasidharan
For the Respondents: Sri. George Poonthottam, Ms. Hana Karnolia Madona Cyril, Sri. Saigi Jacob Palatty

The court reaffirmed that cooperative society membership is a personal right requiring statutory notice prior to removal, and that an administrator lacks authority to confer membership, ensuring adherence to democratic member control.

Headnote:(A) Kerala Cooperative Societies Act, 1969 - Sections 16(1), 16(2), 16(3), 104 - Writ Appeal - Jurisdiction of Administrator to grant or terminate membership - Membership being a personal right requires statutory notice prior to removal - Notice via newspaper insufficient where individual rights at stake. (Paras 6, 9, 21, 24, 30)

(B) Personal right to membership - Right to be heard mandatory in removal process, as per Rule 16(3) - Quashing of notices affecting all members improper where only individual petitioners contest the removal. (Paras 4, 5, 42, 48)

(C) Legal proceedings under KCS Act must respect democratic member control and due process - Membership granted by Administrator without authority deemed invalid. (Paras 10, 11, 32)

Table of Content
1. intra court appeal details. (Para 1)
2. impugned notices' legality and jurisdictional issues. (Para 3 , 4)
3. issues of locus standi and membership challenges. (Para 5 , 8 , 10 , 36)
4. power of administrators regarding membership removal. (Para 6 , 7 , 11 , 19 , 20)
5. membership conferred by administrators deemed illegal. (Para 12 , 14 , 28)
6. conclusion on challenges and procedural outcomes. (Para 32 , 45)
7. procedural requirements for member removal. (Para 38 , 40)

1. The instant intra court appeal has been instituted under S.5(i) of the Kerala High Court Act, to impugn the judgment dated 10.8.2020, rendered by the learned Single Judge, disposing of the Writ Petition (Civil) WP(C). No. 9550/2020. The appellants herein are R - 2 & R - 3 in the WP(C). R - 1 & R - 2 in the appeal are the two writ petitioners and official respondent No.3 in the appeal is official respondent No.1 in the WP(C).

2. Heard Sri. P. C. Sasidharan, learned counsel appearing for the appellants in the W.A. [R - 2 & R - 3 in the WP(C)], Sri. George Poonthottam, learned senior counsel instructed by Ms. Hana Karnolia Madona Cyril, learned counsel appearing for R - 1 & R - 2 in the W.A. (writ petitioners) and Sri. Saigi Jacob Palatty, learned Senior Government Pleader appearing for official respondent No.3 in the W.A. (The Joint Registrar of Co - operative Societies).

3. It is the case of the two petitioners in the WP(C) that they are members of the appellant Co - operative Society and that, the Administrator of the said Co - operative Society has issued the impugned notices, as per Ext.P - 1 dated 18.3.2020 and Ext.P - 2 dated 18.3.2020, that 4464 members of the said Co - operative Society, including the two writ petitioners, have been directed to offer their explanation as to why they shall not be removed from the membership rolls of the said Society, as they were enrolled by the Part - Time Administrator during the period 2011 - 2014 and that, they should give their explanation to the said notices within 10 days from the date of publication of such notices in newspapers. The writ petitioners have taken the plea that the said impugned notices as per Exts.P - 1 & P - 2 are illegal and ultra vires and have been issued without authority, as the Administrator has no jurisdiction to remove any members on the grounds stated in the notices and that, the proposed action for removal of such members, including the writ petitioners, will not come within the jurisdictional parameters of R.16(3) of the Kerala Co - operative Societies Rules, 1969 (hereinafter referred to as "The KCS Rules") inasmuch as the appellants cannot have any case that the said members were either ineligible at the time of their admission or they have subsequently acquired any ineligibility, etc. Further that, the membership right is a personal right and any such drastic step of removal can only be on the basis of the statutory registered notice, in terms of S.104 of the Kerala Co - operative Societies Act, 1969 (hereinafter referred to as "The KCS Act or The Act"), which postulates registered notice and that, mere publication of such notices to 4464 members, without individual registered notices to each one of them, is illegal and ultra vires, etc. Further that, the writ petitioners and others were initially given only Class - C membership by the Administrator which is without voting rights and later, after the elected Committee had assumed power, their admissions to the membership rolls were regularized by the elected Managing Committee and later, was also approved by the General Body of the Society, etc. It is in the light of these aspects that respondents 1 & 2 herein have preferred the instant Writ Petition (Civil) with the following prayers:
"i. Call for the records leading to Exhibit P1 and notices / publications and similar notices and to quash the same by issuing a writ of Certiorari.
ii. Call for the proceedings issued by the 1st respondent Joint Registrar directing the 2nd r











































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top