Back
KERALA HIGH COURT
Alexander Thomas, Shoba Annamma Eapen, JJ.
R - 2 & R - 3 – Appellant
Versus
R - 1 & R - 2 – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. intra court appeal details. (Para 1) |
| 2. impugned notices' legality and jurisdictional issues. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. issues of locus standi and membership challenges. (Para 5 , 8 , 10 , 36) |
| 4. power of administrators regarding membership removal. (Para 6 , 7 , 11 , 19 , 20) |
| 5. membership conferred by administrators deemed illegal. (Para 12 , 14 , 28) |
| 6. conclusion on challenges and procedural outcomes. (Para 32 , 45) |
| 7. procedural requirements for member removal. (Para 38 , 40) |
1. The instant intra court appeal has been instituted under S.5(i) of the Kerala High Court Act, to impugn the judgment dated 10.8.2020, rendered by the learned Single Judge, disposing of the Writ Petition (Civil) WP(C). No. 9550/2020. The appellants herein are R - 2 & R - 3 in the WP(C). R - 1 & R - 2 in the appeal are the two writ petitioners and official respondent No.3 in the appeal is official respondent No.1 in the WP(C).
2. Heard Sri. P. C. Sasidharan, learned counsel appearing for the appellants in the W.A. [R - 2 & R - 3 in the WP(C)], Sri. George Poonthottam, learned senior counsel instructed by Ms. Hana Karnolia Madona Cyril, learned counsel appearing for R - 1 & R - 2 in the W.A. (writ petiti
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
