Back
KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
K. Surendra Mohan (President), *Radhakrishnan K. R. (Member)
Gulshan Medicare v. Manoj Chacko
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. relevant complaint details and background. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. opponents' arguments about service upheld. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's evaluation of evidence on medical certificate. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. validity and repercussions of issued medical certificate. (Para 9 , 10 , 15) |
| 5. final ruling and dismissal of the appeal. (Para 11 , 14 , 16) |
1. This is an appeal filed under S.15 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 against the order dated 30.11.2016 in C.C. No. 20/2014 on the file of the Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Ernakulam (District Commission for short). As per the order, the appellant / first opposite party is directed to pay a compensation of Rs.One lakh within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of the order failing which the complainant is entitled for 18% interest from the due date till realisation of the amount.
2. Brief details of the complaint are as follows.
The complaint pertains to a medical certificate, prescribed for employment in Gulf Cooperation Council countries, which stated the complainant as 'unfit' after having conducted the medical check up by the first opposite party. The complainant was employed in Saudi Arabia. He came on lea
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
