Back
KERALA HIGH COURT
M.R. Anitha, J
Kunjumon P. K. v. Mathew P. K.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. filing of revision and identification of parties involved. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. background of the case regarding dishonoured cheque and trial outcomes. (Para 6 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. legal standards and arguments surrounding evidence and burden of proof. (Para 10 , 18 , 19) |
| 4. judicial guidance on limits of revisional jurisdiction. (Para 12 , 13) |
| 5. conclusion affirming previous convictions. (Para 22) |
1. This revision has been filed under S.397 and S.401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short 'the CrPC' hereinafter), challenging judgment in S.T.No.66/2012, dated 30.10.2021 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court - II, Ettumanoor and also the judgment in Crl.Appeal No.108/2021 on the file of the Additional Sessions Court - 1, Kottayam.
2. The revision petitioner is the accused in the above case.
3. The respondents herein are the original complainant as well as the State of Kerala.
4. Heard the learned counsel for the revision petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor, on admission. Notice to the first respondent stands dispensed with.
5. I shall refer the parties as 'complainant' and 'accused', for convenience.
6. Bereft of unnecessary details, the case put
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
