SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 63636

KERALA HIGH COURT
M.R. Anitha, J
Kunjumon P. K. v. Mathew P. K.


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Not listed
For the Respondents: Not listed

1. This revision has been filed under S.397 and S.401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short 'the CrPC' hereinafter), challenging judgment in S.T.No.66/2012, dated 30.10.2021 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court - II, Ettumanoor and also the judgment in Crl.Appeal No.108/2021 on the file of the Additional Sessions Court - 1, Kottayam.

2. The revision petitioner is the accused in the above case.

3. The respondents herein are the original complainant as well as the State of Kerala.

4. Heard the learned counsel for the revision petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor, on admission. Notice to the first respondent stands dispensed with.

5. I shall refer the parties as 'complainant' and 'accused', for convenience.

6. Bereft of unnecessary details, the case put up by the complainant before the trial court is as under:
The complainant launched prosecution alleging commission of offence under S.138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (for short 'the NI Act' hereinafter), when cheque for Rs.1,20,000/- (Rupees One Lakh Twenty Thousand only) dated 18.5.2012, allegedly issued by the accused to the complainant was dishonoured when the same was presented for collection,

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top