Back
KERALA HIGH COURT
N. Nagaresh, J
A. Venugopalan v. District Labour officer Malappuram
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to registration due to lack of notice. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. argument against the registration based on competition among workers. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. interpretation of statutory provisions regarding worker registration. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. court's evaluation of compliance with procedural requirements. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
1. The petitioners have filed this writ petition challenging Exhibit P3 order dated 28.05.2014 passed by the Assistant Labour Officer, Perinthalmanna, Malappuram, respondent No.2 under R.26A of the Kerala Headload Workers Rules, 1981 ('Rules, 1981' for short) and Exhibit P7 appellate order dated 22.09.2014 passed by the District Labour Officer, Malappuram, respondent No.1, under R.26C of the Rules, 1981 affirming Exhibit P3 order. As per Exhibit P3 order, registration was granted to respondent Nos. 5 to 11, who are attached to the 4th respondent establishment namely M/s. Malabar Pipes and Sheets, Manathumangalam, Perinthalmanna, Malappuram.
2. Brief material facts for the disposal of the writ petition are as follows: Respondent Nos. 5 to 11 have submitted applications under R.26A of the Rules, 1981 before the Assis
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
