Back
KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
Adv. George Cherian Karippaparambil, J
Sivadasan P. K. v. Skyline Builders
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appellant claims recovery of excess amounts. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. respondents argue no unfair trade practices were present. (Para 4 , 11) |
| 3. district forum's duties under the act must be upheld. (Para 5 , 10) |
| 4. final outcome of dismissal affirmed. (Para 6 , 8) |
| 5. complaint must be disposed on merits when admitted. (Para 7 , 9) |
1. The complainant in C.C. No. 191/2014 of the Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Ernakulam (District Forum for short) is in appeal. He is aggrieved by the final order dated 5.5.2016 of the District Forum dismissing the complaint. The complaint has been dismissed without prejudice to the right of the appellant to file appropriate proceedings before a Civil Court for recovery of the excess amounts paid by him.
2. The complaint was filed by the appellant alleging that excess amounts had been charged from him by the respondent herein, over and above what was agreed upon between the parties as per an agreement executed among them. The respondents are builders who are engaged in the construction of building complexes and villas for residential and commercial purposes. As per an agreement dated 17.10.2007 the appellant had agreed to purchase and the re
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
