SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 55578

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
A.M. Khanwilkar, Aniruddha Bose, C.T. Ravikumar, JJ
Indian Medical Association Kerala State Branch Thiruvananthapuram v. Union of India
Writ Appeals | W.A.No.1659 of 2024 | W.A.No.1487 of 2024 | W.A.No.468 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Sri. Arvind P. Datar, Sri. P. R. Renganath
For the Respondents: Sri. Ar. L. Sundaresan, Sri. Mohammed Rafiq

The amendments to the Central and Kerala GST Acts that retrospectively impose taxes on services rendered by clubs to members violate the principle of mutuality, rendering them unconstitutional.

Headnote:(A) Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 - Sections 2(17)(e) and 7(1)(aa) - Kerala Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 - Constitutional challenge - Amendments deemed to impose GST on services by clubs/associations to members violated mutuality principle established in case law - The Supreme Court's decision in Calcutta Club Ltd. recognized that services provided by clubs remain non-taxable due to identity between club and members - Petitioner challenged amendments as unconstitutional under Article 246A and 366(12A) - The court held that definitions aim to artificially treat members and clubs as separate entities, violating mutuality - Retrospective effect of amendments was criticized for being arbitrary and unfair. (Paras 11-24)

(B) Constitutional Law - Taxation - Principle of mutuality - Legislative power to tax relies on existence of transaction between distinct legal entities - Retrospective taxation must avoid unfairness and arbitrariness, maintaining Rule of Law. (Paras 14-19)

Facts of the case:
The Kerala State Branch of the Indian Medical Association challenged GST levied on services it rendered to members, arguing it fell under mutual benefit and thus should remain non-taxable, as the legal identity between club and its members nullifies the concept of separate 'supply'. The amendments introduced to the CGST and KGST Acts deemed these services taxable retroactively from 01/07/2017 without prior notice or anticipation.

Findings of Court:
The amendments under S.2(17)(e) and S.7(1)(aa) violate the established doctrine of mutuality, ruling these as unconstitutional. The court affirmed that retrospective taxation lacks justification and fairness, emphasizing the intrinsic link between service, supply, and the necessity of two distinct parties.

Issues: The court addressed the constitutionality of the GST amendments, mutuality principles, implications of retrospective tax law, and legislative competence.

Ratio Decidendi: The court reasoned that the concept of service under GST mandates a separation between service provider and recipient; the amendments contravene this by deeming club activities taxable, which contradicts prior Supreme Court judgments upholding mutuality. Thus, both the CGST and KGST provisions were unconstitutional.

Result: Writ appeal allowed, deemed provisions struck down.

Table of Content
1. writ appeals concerning gst dispute. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. petitioner's argument on mutuality and gst. (Para 4 , 5)
3. arguments on constitutionality of gst provisions. (Para 8 , 9 , 10)
4. explanation on legislative powers and tax implications. (Para 11 , 12 , 13)
5. court's conclusion on constitutional validity and fairness. (Para 22 , 23)

1. These Writ Appeals, one preferred by the petitioner in W.P. (C).No.21297 of 2023 and the other two preferred by the GST Officials of the Union and the Kerala State, impugn the judgment dated 23.07.2024 of a learned Single Judge in W.P.(C).No.21297 of 2023.

2. The Facts in Brief:

The essential facts necessary for disposal of these Writ Appeals are as follows:

W.P.(C).No.21297 of 2023 was preferred by the Kerala State Branch of the Indian Medical Association apprehending coercive action from the Directorate General of GST Intelligence for recovery of tax on various services rendered by it to its members. While it was the petitioner's contention that it was not liable to pay tax on the supply of services to its members, it apprehended coercive action for recovery of tax when it was served with summons requiring it to produce details of the registration taken by it under the GST Act and their audited books of accounts and other financial documents for the financial years from 2017-18 to 2021-22.

3. The petitioner runs various mutual Schemes for the benefit of its member - doctors, e.g. Social Security Schemes or SSS (I, II, and III), Professional Disability Support Scheme (PDSS), Professional Protection Scheme, Kerala Health Scheme, etc. All the Schemes are to support fellow doctors, while one or two Schemes support their immediate family members. The member - doctors contribute an admission / annual fee, and in cases of certain Schemes (e.g. SSS, PDSS) also a fraternity contribution upon the death / disability of a fellow member doctor; the pooled sum is paid out to the widow of deceased doctors, disabled doctors, doctors afflicted with specified diseases, etc. Each Scheme is run by a separately elected committee, in which the Secretary and President of the petitioner are ex officio members. The Schemes have separate bank accounts, and accounts of each Scheme are drawn up and separately audited. A brief description of the Schemes is as given below:

"Social Security Schemes

i) Objects: The objects of the schemes are to provide financial assistance to the families of the medical practitioner in the event of his or her death, or in the event of a member suffering permanent disability that renders the member unfit to practice the profession for life. The objects also encompass undertaking various charitable / philanthropic activities such as providing medical aid to the needy and poor, family welfare programmes independently / jointly with the Government, organising blood donation camps, eye camps, promoting medical education, etc.

ii) Payment: Any doctor who is a member of the petitioner may become a member of these Social Security Schemes upon payment of an admission fee which is graded depending upon the age of the doctor. The member is then required to pay an annual subscription of Rs.300 to Rs.1,000 for a period of 20 to 25 years.

iii) Death / Permanent disability: Upon the death / permanent disability of a member, every other member of that scheme is to pay a specified "fraternity contribution" ranging from Rs.100 to Rs.500 depending upon the number of years for which the deceased member had been a member of the scheme. The fraternity contribution (calculated as a product of the individual fraternity contribution and the net membership of scheme concerned, subject to a maximum specified under the bye - laws) is handed over to the family of the deceased / permanently disabled member and the remaining portion, if any, is credited to the corpus of the scheme concerned to be paid out in future.

Professional Disability Support Scheme

i) Object: The object of the scheme is to provide financi





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top